The idea (started in 1920)
that
Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford
is the real author of Shakespeare's
works
is almost certainly nonsense,
but it does provide the opportunity to see de Vere portrayed in fiction.
The idea that the
17th Earl of Oxford is "the real Shakespeare"
is called "Oxfordian" theory.
Almost all professional historians and academics reject this.
See
evidence against Oxfordian theory.
There is no documentary evidence linking Oxford to Shakespeare.
Oxfordians are reduced to looking for other "evidence",
such as reading parallels between the plots and Oxford's life.
Some people have claimed that the
Ashbourne portrait
is de Vere and/or Shakespeare,
but this seems to be well disproved.
One of the 17th Earl's daughters appears.
The screenplay
shows it is
Bridget de Vere.
The opportunity to see the above on screen
is spoilt by the fact that the entire film seems to be fiction.
It is hard to believe in a single scene.
The film includes not only the
Oxfordian theory
(invented in 1920)
but also the even more outlandish
"Prince Tudor II theory"
(invented in 2001).
In this ludicrous film:
De Vere
is the illegitimate son of Elizabeth I.
De Vere and his own mother, Elizabeth I, have an affair.
De Vere writes the plays for reasons that make no sense,
stays anonymous for reasons that make no sense,
and other people keep this secret for reasons that make no sense.
Please donate to support this site.
I have spent a great deal of time and money on this research.
Research involves travel and many expenses.
Some research "things to do"
are not done for years, because I do not have the money to do them.
Please Donate Here
to support the ongoing research and
to keep this website free.